25-1161

The City Attorney's Office is requesting that the Los Angeles City Council hold a closed session to discuss legal strategy regarding an ongoing federal lawsuit challenging the City's $63 late fee on unpaid parking citations.

District
First Seen November 12, 2025
Last Seen November 12, 2025
Appearances 1 meeting(s)
Official title: The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled

Timeline

Related documents

Report from City Attorney dated 10-06-25
What is Being Proposed?

The City Attorney's Office is requesting that the Los Angeles City Council hold a closed session to discuss legal strategy regarding an ongoing federal lawsuit challenging the City's $63 late fee on unpaid parking citations. The case, Jesus Pimentel et al. v. City of Los Angeles, has been in federal court since 2014 (Case No. CV14-01371-FMO).

Why?

The plaintiffs are mounting a constitutional challenge to the City's parking citation late fee structure. The City Attorney needs to meet with the Council in a closed session—permitted under California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)—to discuss litigation strategy, legal advice, and recommendations on how to proceed with this case. This type of sensitive legal discussion is conducted in closed session to protect attorney-client privilege and litigation strategy.

Key Details

Case name: Jesus Pimentel et al. v. City of Los Angeles et al. Case number: USDC CV14-01371-FMO (federal court) Issue: Constitutional challenge to the City's $63 late fee for unpaid parking citations Lead attorneys: Assistant City Attorney Gabriel S. Dermer and Deputy City Attorney Arlene N. Hoang Report date: October 6, 2025

Impact

This affects how Los Angeles administers parking citation enforcement and revenue collection. The outcome could determine whether the $63 late fee structure can continue or must be modified, potentially impacting city revenue and parking enforcement policies.